A debt avalanche is bearing down on the U.S. cannabis market to the tune of roughly six billion dollars coming due by the end of 2026, with the top five borrowers—each a multi-state operator (“MSO”)—accounting for about $3.4 billion. The sector’s reliance on costly debt, born of limited access to traditional capital, has set the stage for a potentially messy, uneven reckoning.
Why this matters now
- Scale and timing: The maturities bunch up into 2026, compressing the refinancing window and elevating risk across the ecosystem.
- Cash flow stress: Many capital structures are expensive, and several operators still burn cash, curbing their ability to refinance on favorable terms.
- Market significance: Despite headwinds, cannabis generated $32 billion in 2024 revenue, employed 400,000+ people, and contributed $4.4 billion in state taxes—meaning outcomes here have real economic spillovers.
How it’s playing out
- Proactive refinancing: One MSO refinanced $360 million into a $325 million senior secured term loan maturing in 2030 at 12.5 percent, pushing out near-term risk and shoring up flexibility.
- Early negotiations: Another top MSO holds $403 million of debt with $350 million due October 2026 and has begun refinancing talks while cutting costs and managing cash.
- Forced restructurings: A well-known MSO, facing $368 million due in 2026, is selling licenses across eight states and winding down operations to satisfy lenders.
- Hardening lender stance: Litigation around overleveraged operators signals a shift from “extend-and-pretend” toward enforcement, revaluations, and potential receiverships.
Implications for the industry
- Consolidation and asset churn: Expect more sales of licenses, retail footprints, and cultivation assets. Stronger balance sheets will pick up distressed assets at revised valuations.
- “Zombie” risk: Some operators may continue serving customers while functionally insolvent, tying up capital and complicating competitive dynamics until creditors force resolutions.
- Cost of capital: Rates remain elevated for cannabis credits. Even successful refinancings will likely price high and carry tighter covenants.
- Policy and permitting friction: Local moves, like Somerville, MA’s, nine-month extension of its moratorium on new Host Community Agreements restrict new retail entries. Slower store rollouts reduce growth optionality—making debt service harder and business plans riskier.
What this means for other cannabis businesses
- Tighter vendor terms: As credit tightens, suppliers may shorten payment windows and demand deposits or collateral.
- Survival through discipline: Free cash flow discipline, early dialogue with creditors, and operational cost takeouts become the difference between refinancing and restructuring.
- Opportunity for the prepared: Well-capitalized operators can acquire quality assets from distressed sellers and expand selectively.
- Be refinancing-ready: Maintain clean financials, prove stable store-level EBITDA, and show credible paths to paydown or refinance.
What this means for financial institutions already invested in cannabis
- Portfolio triage: Categorize credits by refinancing probability and cash flow coverage. Prioritize proactive amendments now rather than last-minute forbearance.
- Expect revaluations: Collateral values and enterprise multiples are resetting.
- Engage early: Negotiated solutions can produce better recoveries than enforcement.
- Operational oversight: Require tighter reporting, borrowing bases, and milestones. Push for cost rationalizations before liquidity pinches.
Read the rest of this story at National Review
