As more states move toward legalization, accurately detecting impaired driving is of the utmost importance. Field Sobriety Tests (FSTs) have long been the go-to method for law enforcement to assess driver impairment caused by substances like alcohol.
However, a recent 2023 study published in JAMA Psychiatry raises serious questions about the accuracy of these tests when it comes to detecting impairment induced by tetrahydrocannabinol (THC).
Let’s take a closer at the study’s findings and examine the legal ramifications of relying on an outdated evaluation system.
The significance of accurate impairment testing cannot be overstated. It is not merely a matter of acknowledging its acceptance but also ensuring responsible use, particularly when it comes to driving.
The inaccuracy of impairment detection not only puts road safety at risk but also exposes innocent drivers to potential legal consequences. Even a small infraction can make someone’s life harder than it has to be — all over a potentially flawed test.
The current reliance on FSTs to assess cannabis-induced impairment in the U.S. poses a challenge. It requires striking a balance between adjusting to societal changes and ensuring public safety.
To read more, click on Veriheal